All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

The MPN Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

2024-01-12T17:17:29.000Z

Selinexor + ruxolitinib in JAK-naïve patients: Long-term follow-up from the XPORT-MF-034 study

Jan 12, 2024
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite key efficacy and safety data from the XPORT-MF-034 trial.

Bookmark this article

Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.

Myelofibrosis is a heterogeneous, progressive, and fatal disease with several unmet needs in its therapeutic management. Due to limited responses with ruxolitinib (RUX) treatment, a lack of apparent disease modification, and the challenge of treating patients with anemia/thrombocytopenia with conventional Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) treatment, there remains an urgent need for therapies beyond current JAKi therapy.

Selinexor, an investigational targeted oral exportin-1 inhibitor, has shown activity against both Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription and non-Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription signaling pathways. The XPORT-MF-034 trial (NCT04562389) is an ongoing phase I/III study investigating the combination of selinexor plus RUX for the treatment of JAKi naïve patients with myelofibrosis. During the 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, Tantravahi presented long-term follow-up results from the XPORT-MF-034 study. Here, we summarize the key results.

For more information on the current status of combination therapies in myeloproliferative neoplasms, check out our recent article.

Study design1

The full study design and selected inclusion criteria are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Study design* 

AE, adverse event; PO, oral; QW, once weekly; RUX, ruxolitinib; SVR35, spleen volume reduction ≥35%; TSS50, Total Symptom Score reduction ≥50%.
*Adapted from Tantravahi.1

 Results

The baseline characteristics for patients treated with 60 mg selinexor once weekly are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics*

Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated)

Selinexor 60 mg QW + RUX
(n = 14)

Median age, years

64.5

female

35.7

Transfusion status

              Dependent

7.1

              Independent

92.9

DIPSS risk

              Intermediate-1

21.4

              Intermediate-2

57.1

              High risk

21.4

Hb level at baseline

              <10 g/dL

57.1

              ≥10 g/dL

42.9

Platelet count at baseline

              100 to <150 × 109/L

14.3

              ≥150 × 109/L

85.7

Median baseline spleen volume, cm3

1,961.6

Mean baseline TSS, n

21.6

DIPSS, Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System; Hb, hemoglobin; QW, once-weekly; RUX, ruxolitinib; TSS, Total Symptom Score.
*Adapted from Tantravahi.1

Efficacy

  • Spleen volume reduction ≥35% (SVR35) and total symptom score reduction ≥50% (TSS50) at any time were attained by 100% and 90% of patients treated with selinexor 60 mg once weekly, respectively.
  • The percentages of patients achieving SVR35 .and TSS50 at Week 12 and Week 24 are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. A SVR35 and B TSS50 at Week 12 and Week 24* 

SVR35, spleen volume reduction ≥35%; TSS50, total symptom score reduction ≥50%.
*Adapted from Tantravahi.1

  • The median duration of response for both SVR35 and TSS50 was not reached.
    • The median time for SVR35 and TSS50 response was 12.1 weeks.
    • The median duration of follow-up for SVR35 and TSS50 was 32 and 51 weeks, respectively.
    • There was a 100% probability of patients maintaining SVR35 and TSS50 response.
  • Patients experienced sustained decreases in proinflammatory cytokines by Week 4.
  • Decreases in variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥20% were experienced by five patients.
    • Three of these patients had a VAF≥ 50% at baseline.
  • In total, 11 of 13 patients with VAF values at baseline achieved an SVR35 at any time.

Safety

  • The most common adverse event (AE) of any grade experienced by ≥30% of patients was nausea (78.6%), followed by anemia (64.3%).
  • The most common Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs experienced by >5% of patients are shown in Figure 3.
    • Two patients experienced treatment-emergent AEs that led to treatment discontinuation.
  • Median hemoglobin and platelet counts remained stable.
    • 10.1 g/dL at baseline, 9.3 g/dL at Week 12, and 10.2 g/dL at Week 24.

Figure 3. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events experienced by >5% of patients* 

TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.
*Adapted from Tantravahi.1

 Conclusion

This study demonstrated that selinexor and RUX was well tolerated and safety was manageable. Patients treated with selinexor 60 mg once weekly and RUX experienced durable SVR and symptom improvement, including those who received a suboptimal dose of RUX. Results also showed potential indicators of disease modification, including reduced VAF and decreased levels of proinflammatory cytokines, as early as Week 4. The combination of selinexor 60 mg once weekly and RUX has the potential to become a first-line treatment for JAKi-naïve patients with myelofibrosis and is currently being assessed in the ongoing phase III trial.

  1. Tantravahi S. Selinexor plus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor (JAKi)-naïve patients with myelofibrosis: Long-term follow-up from XPORT-MF-034 Suggestive of Disease Modification. Oral abstract #622. 65th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; Dec 11, 2023; San Diego, US.

Your opinion matters

What do you consider to be the highest unmet need for patients with myelofibrosis?​
2 votes - 25 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox