TRANSLATE

The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Current combination therapies in MPN

By Oscar Williams

Share:

Dec 19, 2023

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite new combination therapies for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms.


Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.

Question 1 of 2

Patients who experienced a suboptimal response to ruxolitinib monotherapy are being investigated in the phase II REFINE study analyzing ruxolitinib plus the BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax. Results have shown evidence of disease modification. What percentage of patients experienced a complete resolution of bone marrow fibrosis?

A

B

C

D

In recent years, combination approaches for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) have rapidly accelerated, with many late-phase clinical studies currently ongoing. These exciting treatment combinations offer the potential of previously unattainable disease modification and the possibility of new treatments in the near future.

During the 15th International Congress on MPN, John Mascarenhas presented the current status of combination therapies in the field of MPN. Here, we summarize the key points.

For more information on the current landscape of treatment options for patients with myelofibrosis (MF), check out our interview with John Mascarenhas and our review of current combination therapies for JAKi-naïve patients.

Bromodomain and extra-terminal motif inhibition

  • The combination of the bromodomain and extra-terminal inhibitor pelabresib, together with ruxolitinib, has shown potential for disease modification in MF
  • There has also been synergism reported in the treatment of blast phase disease
  • The combination therapy was recently investigated in the phase II MANIFEST trial (NCT02158858) for patients who were Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi)-naïve
  • Key endpoints are shown in Table 1

Table 1. MANIFEST trial key results*

SVR35, ≥35% reduction in spleen volume; TSS50, ≥50% reduction in Total Symptom Score.
*Adapted from Mascarenhas.1

Trial endpoint

Patients (%)

SVR35 at Week 24

68

SVR35 at any time

80

TSS50 at Week 24

56

TSS50 at any time

83

  • Treatment-emergent adverse events that lead to treatment discontinuation were experienced by 14% of patients

B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibition

  • The B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor navitoclax, in combination with ruxolitinib, is currently under investigation for use in patients for whom ruxolitinib monotherapy did not yield an adequate response
  • In particular, arm three of the phase II REFINE study (NCT03222609) investigated the use of this combination in patients who were JAKi-naïve
  • Key results indicating potential disease modification are shown in Table 2

Table 2. REFINE trial arm three key results*

BMF, bone marrow fibrosis; JAK2, Janus kinase 2; VAF, variant allele frequency.
*Adapted from Mascarenhas.1
No differences from baseline to Week 12 or Week 24 in patients with or without high molecular risk mutations (47% vs 54%).

Trial endpoint, %

Patients

BMF reduction ≥Grade 1

28

Complete BMF resolution

22

Reduction in JAK2V617F VAF ≥20%

50

Exportin 1 inhibition

  • The exportin 1 inhibitor selinexor, in combination with ruxolitinib, is currently under investigation for the treatment of JAKi-naïve patients with MF.
  • Key results from the phase I XPORT-MF-034 study (NCT04562389) are shown in Table 3.

Table 3. XPORT-MF-034 study key results*

SVR35, ≥35% reduction in spleen volume; TSS50, ≥50% reduction in Total Symptom Score.
*Adapted from Mascarenhas.1

Trial endpoint at Week 24

Patients (%)

Selinexor 40 mg

Selinexor 60 mg

Efficacy evaluable

SVR35

50

91.7

TSS50

57.1

77.8

Intent-to-treat

SVR35

40

78.6

TSS50

40

58.3

Treatment was generally tolerable, with a manageable safety profile even at the higher dose (60 mg).

Murine double minute 2 inhibition

  • The murine double minute 2 inhibitor navtemadlin, combined with ruxolitinib, was investigated in the phase Ib/II KRT-232-109 study (NCT04485260) for patients in whom ruxolitinib monotherapy yielded a suboptimal response
  • Key results from the trial are shown in Table 4

Table 4. Key results from the KRT-232-109 study*

BMF, bone marrow fibrosis; SVR35, ≥35% reduction in spleen volume; TSS50, ≥50% reduction in Total Symptom Score.
*Adapted from Mascarenhas.1

Trial endpoint, %

Patients

SVR35 at Week 24

32

TSS50 at Week 24

32

BMF reduction ≥Grade 1 at Week 24

57

The phase III BOREAS trial (NCT03662126) investigating this combination therapy is ongoing.

Telomerase inhibition

  • The combination of imetelstat and ruxolitinib for JAKi-naïve, intermediate/high-risk patients with MF is under investigation in the phase I/Ib MYF1001 study (NCT05371964)
  • The study places particular emphasis on both combination and sequential treatment of the two therapies

Conclusion

Several combination therapies for MPN are currently in late-stage development. Over the next 5 years, there is potential for a noticeable shift in the treatment paradigm, with combination therapies moving to the forefront of MPN treatment. Currently, there is a lack of data surrounding combination approaches after JAKi usage, emphasizing the need for further research into the feasibility of novel JAKi-based combinations.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content