The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mpn content recommended for you
Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.
Question 1 of 2
Patients who experienced a suboptimal response to ruxolitinib monotherapy are being investigated in the phase II REFINE study analyzing ruxolitinib plus the BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax. Results have shown evidence of disease modification. What percentage of patients experienced a complete resolution of bone marrow fibrosis?
A
B
C
D
In recent years, combination approaches for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) have rapidly accelerated, with many late-phase clinical studies currently ongoing. These exciting treatment combinations offer the potential of previously unattainable disease modification and the possibility of new treatments in the near future.
During the 15th International Congress on MPN, John Mascarenhas presented the current status of combination therapies in the field of MPN. Here, we summarize the key points.
For more information on the current landscape of treatment options for patients with myelofibrosis (MF), check out our interview with John Mascarenhas and our review of current combination therapies for JAKi-naïve patients.
Table 1. MANIFEST trial key results*
SVR35, ≥35% reduction in spleen volume; TSS50, ≥50% reduction in Total Symptom Score. |
|
Trial endpoint |
Patients (%) |
---|---|
SVR35 at Week 24 |
68 |
SVR35 at any time |
80 |
TSS50 at Week 24 |
56 |
TSS50 at any time |
83 |
Table 2. REFINE trial arm three key results*
BMF, bone marrow fibrosis; JAK2, Janus kinase 2; VAF, variant allele frequency. |
|
Trial endpoint, % |
Patients |
---|---|
BMF reduction ≥Grade 1 |
28 |
Complete BMF resolution |
22 |
Reduction in JAK2V617F VAF ≥20% |
50† |
Table 3. XPORT-MF-034 study key results*
SVR35, ≥35% reduction in spleen volume; TSS50, ≥50% reduction in Total Symptom Score. |
|||
Trial endpoint at Week 24 |
Patients (%) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Selinexor 40 mg |
Selinexor 60 mg |
||
Efficacy evaluable |
SVR35 |
50 |
91.7 |
TSS50 |
57.1 |
77.8 |
|
Intent-to-treat |
SVR35 |
40 |
78.6 |
TSS50 |
40 |
58.3 |
Treatment was generally tolerable, with a manageable safety profile even at the higher dose (60 mg).
Table 4. Key results from the KRT-232-109 study*
BMF, bone marrow fibrosis; SVR35, ≥35% reduction in spleen volume; TSS50, ≥50% reduction in Total Symptom Score. |
|
Trial endpoint, % |
Patients |
---|---|
SVR35 at Week 24 |
32 |
TSS50 at Week 24 |
32 |
BMF reduction ≥Grade 1 at Week 24 |
57 |
The phase III BOREAS trial (NCT03662126) investigating this combination therapy is ongoing.
Several combination therapies for MPN are currently in late-stage development. Over the next 5 years, there is potential for a noticeable shift in the treatment paradigm, with combination therapies moving to the forefront of MPN treatment. Currently, there is a lack of data surrounding combination approaches after JAKi usage, emphasizing the need for further research into the feasibility of novel JAKi-based combinations.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content