All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Insights into primary myelofibrosis (PMF) driver mutations have led to the development of several classifications for the prediction of OS and transformation to AML, including DIPSS, MIPSS, and MTSS.1 However, optimal patient selection and timing for transplantation remain unclear. Paz et al.1 conducted a cohort study to analyze the potential survival benefit associated with HSCT according to clinicobiological scores, incorporating MIPSS, to facilitate decision-making in this context. Data from a transplant cohort of patients who received transplantation between 2001 and 2022 (n = 239) and a matched non-transplant cohort (n = 105) were used to determine whether patients with PMF and a higher risk molecular score benefit from HSCT. Their findings were published in Blood Advances.1 |
Key learnings |
HSCT was associated with improved 6-year OS vs non-transplant across intermediate-2 (60.1% vs 41.5%) and high-risk DIPSS (44.4% vs 6.55%), MIPSS70 (46.5% vs 23.9%), high-risk (73.2% vs 39.7%), and very high-risk MIPSS70+V2 (51.8% vs 24%) groups. |
The survival gain with transplantation in DIPSS intermediate-2 and high-risk patients was +18.6% and +37.9%, respectively. Patients with intermediate MIPSS70 scores achieved an OS benefit with HSCT only if their MTSS scores were low or intermediate. |
Following the 1-year landmark, transplantation reduced the risk of mortality in patients with DIPSS high or intermediate-2, MIPSS70 high, HMR mutations, and extended HMR mutations. |
These findings show that MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2 risk scores, in addition to MTSS, are effective in predicting the survival benefit of HSCT in patients with PMF, offering reliable scores for transplant decision-making. |
Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; DIPSS, Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; HMR, high molecular risk; MIPSS, Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for patients aged ≥70 years; MIPSS70+V2, Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for patients aged ≥70 years Version 2; MTSS, Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring system; OS, overall survival; PMF, primary myelofibrosis.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox