All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by GSK, Novartis, AOP, Sobi and Takeda and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines, Incyte and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View MPN content recommended for you
Results from a multicenter, retrospective HERO Consortium cohort study evaluating hypomethylating agent (HMA) combinations in 188 patients with accelerated phase/blast phase (AP/BP) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were published in Leukemia & Lymphoma by Ciervo et al. Patients received HMA ± Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi; n = 94) or HMA + venetoclax ± JAKi (n = 56). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).
Key data: At a median follow-up of 8.6 months, median OS was 9.2 months in both groups
(log-rank p = 0.569). Rates of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) were similar among patients who received HMA + venetoclax and those who received HMA alone (18% vs. 14%; p = 0.51). Median OS in patients who underwent allo-HSCT was 22.0 months vs 9.2 months in those who did not (p < 0.001). Complete response/complete response with incomplete count recovery (CR/CRi) rates were significantly higher in the HMA + venetoclax group vs the HMA group (36% vs 11%; p = 0.0002), as were CR/CRi plus morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) rates (52% vs. 16%; p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.06; p = 0.011) and receipt of allo-HSCT (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20–0.79; p = 0.008) were significant predictors of OS. In the HMA + venetoclax group vs HMA group, febrile neutropenia occurred in 58% vs 54% of patients and infections occurred in 42% vs 45% of patients.
Key learning: In this real-world cohort study, the addition of venetoclax to HMA therapy improved response rates but did not translate to improved OS in patients with AP/BP-MPN, highlighting the continued unmet need for effective therapies in this population.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
HCPs, from your perspective, how important is it to avoid occasional hematocrit levels above 45% in patients with polycythemia vera?