All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View MPN content recommended for you
Do you know... Which of the following is an example of a JAK inhibitor that also inhibits ACVR1, therefore with the dual benefit of reducing splenomegaly and symptoms while improving anemia through ACVR1 inhibition and hepcidin reduction?
The MPN Hub spoke with Aaron Gerds, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, US. We asked about the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis-associated anemia.
During this interview, Gerds discussed the burden and management of myelofibrosis-associated anemia. He explained its prevalence, prognostic importance, and multifactorial causes. Gerds also reviewed currently available therapies, combination strategies, and the need for further disease-modifying approaches.
How I treat myelofibrosis-related anemia
Anemia is common in myelofibrosis, affecting approximately 40% of patients at the time of presentation and developing in nearly all patients over time.1
The severity of anemia is prognostic, with worse anemia linked to shorter survival and transfusion dependence associated with the poorest outcomes.
Myelofibrosis-associated anemia is linked to various causes, including ineffective erythropoiesis, inflammation with elevated hepcidin, drug effects, splenomegaly-related destruction, and sometimes autoimmune hemolysis.
Because multiple mechanisms drive anemia, no single therapy is universally effective, and a range of approaches is required.
Supportive agents such as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, luspatercept, and danazol can improve anemia but do not alter the underlying disease biology of myelofibrosis.
These supportive therapies are most often used when anemia is the primary concern, especially in patients without significant splenomegaly or symptom burden, and can be given with or without Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, allowing for safe use in combination when splenomegaly and symptoms are controlled.
JAK inhibitors that also inhibit ACVR1, such as momelotinib and pacritinib, provide dual benefit by reducing splenomegaly and symptoms through JAK inhibition while improving anemia through ACVR1 inhibition and hepcidin reduction.
Pacritinib also targets Interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 1 (IRAK1), supporting its role in cytopenic myelofibrosis where anemia is central.
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is currently the only treatment that can completely reverse anemia by eradicating disease and restoring erythropoiesis.
Emerging therapies such as pelabresib show promise in improving anemia by addressing disease biology, pointing toward future disease-modifying strategies.
While supportive agents remain essential in current practice, the ultimate goal is to develop therapies that fundamentally modify the pathophysiology of myelofibrosis and restore normal blood cell production.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
If you use erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in the management of myelofibrosis, do you primarily base your use of ESA on patients’ erythropoietin (EPO) levels?