All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by GSK, Novartis, Sumitomo, Sobi, Takeda and Karyopharm and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines, Incyte and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View MPN content recommended for you
Featured:
Do you know... Approximately what proportion of patients with myelofibrosis present with anemia at diagnosis?
The MPN Hub was pleased to speak with Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Université de Paris and Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, FR. We asked, What are the unmet needs in the management of myelofibrosis-related anemia?
In this interview, Kiladjian explores the impact and multifactorial causes of myelofibrosis-related anemia, with particular attention to the on-target effects of JAK inhibition. He reviews currently approved JAK inhibitors, emphasizing the anemia benefits seen with momelotinib and pacritinib. Kiladjian also underscores that JAK inhibitors alone do not completely address myelofibrosis-related anemia, highlighting the potential of JAK inhibitor-based combination therapies to address this unmet need.
What are the unmet needs in the management of myelofibrosis-related anemia?
What are the unmet needs in the management of myelofibrosis-related anemia?
This educational resource is independently supported by GSK. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.
References
Passamonti F, Harrison CN, Mesa RA, et al. Anemia in myelofibrosis: Current and emerging treatment options. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022;180:103862. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103862
Verstovsek S, Gerds AT, Vannucchi AM, et al. Momelotinib versus danazol in symptomatic patients with anaemia and myelofibrosis (MOMENTUM): Results from an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2023;401(10373):269-280. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02036-0
Palandri F, O’Connell C, Vachhani P, et al. Survival impact and kinetics of hemoglobin improvement with momelotinib in patients with myelofibrosis and moderate to severe anemia: Post hoc analyses of SIMPLIFY-1 and MOMENTUM. Poster #PF828. Presented at: European Hematology Association 2025 Congress; Jun 12–15, 2025; Milan, IT.
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.
Your opinion matters
In a patient with MPN, which finding would most increase your suspicion of coexisting systemic mastocytosis?