All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View MPN content recommended for you
Anemia is a common and often severe complication of myelofibrosis (MF). Treatment with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib, can result in dose-dependent anemia in patients with MF, which affects treatment decisions. The recommended treatments for managing anemia include erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and danazol. However, there is a lack of data on outcomes in patients with MF treated with ruxolitinib and anemia medications. During the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2025 Congress, June 12–15, 2025, Milan, IT, Pankit Vachhani presented the findings from a post hoc analysis of the phase III JUMP trial (NCT01493414). This analysis evaluated the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with MF treated with ruxolitinib and ESAs or danazol. The post hoc analysis from the JUMP trial (N = 2233) included 101 patients with MF with a baseline hemoglobin (Hb) level of <12.0 g/dL, including a subset of 52 patients with an Hb level of <10.0 g/dL. Eligible patients received ESAs (epoetin, n = 81; darbepoetin, n = 17) or danazol (n = 3) within 3 months of enrollment and remained on therapy for ≥3 months. The clinical outcomes assessed included spleen length and symptom response.
|
Key learnings |
Spleen length response rates were comparable between the two groups and the overall JUMP patient population. At 12 and 24 weeks, the ≥50% spleen length reduction rates were 41.6% vs 42.3% vs 39.1% and 36.6% vs 34.6% vs 31.5% in the Hb <12.0 g/dL, Hb <10.0 g/dL, and overall JUMP groups. |
Symptoms responses at 24 weeks were also comparable; the ≥6.5 point increase in FACT-Lym TS was observed in 25.7%, 23.1%, and 26.9% of patients in the Hb <12.0 g/dL, Hb <10.0 g/dL, and overall JUMP groups. |
The mean percentage change in Hb level from baseline to Week 48 was +1.5% and +6.5% in the Hb <12.0 g/dL and the Hb <10.0 g/dL groups, respectively. Additionally, 3 patients in the Hb <10.0 g/dL group were TI at 24 weeks. |
Ruxolitinib at a >25 mg daily dose was well tolerated. The findings suggest that ESAs or danazol as a potential option for managing anemia in combination with ruxolitinib, allowing maintenance of ruxolitinib dose intensity in patients with MF and anemia. |
ESA, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent; EHA, European Hematology Association; FACT-Lym TS, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma total score; Hb, hemoglobin; JAK, Janus kinase; MF, myelofibrosis; TI, transfusion-independent.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
What would be your preferred strategy to treat patients with newly diagnosed MF with moderate anemia (Hb <10 g/dL) and platelet count <200,000/µL?