All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.
Pelabresib, a bromodomain and extra-terminal motif inhibitor, is currently under investigation in Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) naïve patients with myelofibrosis (MF) as part of the phase III MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495).1
This trial was selected by the MPN Hub Steering Committee[MP1] as a top abstract at the 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition. Rampal presented the latest data from the MANIFEST-2 clinical trial of pelabresib + ruxolitinib for the treatment of JAKi-naïve myelofibrosis. Here, we summarize the key points.
Key eligibility criteria included:
At Week 24, the rate of SVR35, TSS50, and absolute change in symptom scores were recorded. Overall, the rate of SVR35 and TSS50 was higher in the experimental arm, with a higher mean spleen volume reduction (SVR) across the whole cohort (Figures 1 and 2).
Figure 1. SVR35 and TSS50 at Week 24*
SVR35, ≥35% reduction in spleen volume ; TSS50, ≥50% reduction in Total Symptom Score.
*Adapted from Rampal.1
Figure 2. Incidence of SVR35 and TSS50 in combination and isolation*
RUX, ruxolitinib; SVR35, ≥35% reduction in spleen volume ; TSS50, ≥50% reduction in Total Symptom Score.
*Adapted from Rampal.1
In each measure of TSS, pelabresib + ruxolitinib resulted in a larger mean change in symptom score from baseline to Week 24 (Figure 3). The highest recorded symptom decrease was observed in itching and pain under the left rib vs night sweats and pain under the left rib in the pelabresib arm vs the placebo arm, respectively.
Figure 3. Mean change in TSS by domain from baseline to Week 24*
RUX, ruxolitinib.
*Adapted from Rampal.1
Overall, the safety profile was comparable for the pelabresib and ruxolitinib alone groups (Table 1). A decreased incidence of anemia was observed, which is particularly beneficial for the treatment of MF where anemia is common.
Table 1. Treatment-emergent adverse events*
Treatment-emergent adverse event, % (unless otherwise specified) |
Pelabresib + ruxolitinib |
Placebo + ruxolitinib |
---|---|---|
Any grade AE |
96.7 |
97.2 |
Grade ≥3 AE |
49.1 |
57.5 |
SAE |
29.7 |
29.4 |
Hematologic |
|
|
Anemia |
43.9 |
55.6 |
Thrombocytopenia |
32.1 |
23.4 |
Decreased platelet count |
20.8 |
15.9 |
Non-hematologic |
|
|
Diarrhea |
23.1 |
18.7 |
Dysgeusia |
18.4 |
3.7 |
Constipation |
18.4 |
24.3 |
Nausea |
14.2 |
15.0 |
Cough |
12.7 |
11.2 |
Fatigue |
11.8 |
16.8 |
Dizziness |
11.3 |
8.9 |
Headache |
11.3 |
10.7 |
COVID-19 |
11.3 |
15.9 |
Dyspnea |
9.0 |
13.1 |
AE, adverse event; SAE, serious adverse event. |
Overall, treatment with pelabresib + ruxolitinib resulted in a higher incidence of SVR35 and significantly reduced splenomegaly in JAKi-naïve patients with MF compared with ruxolitinib + placebo. The combination also produced a significantly higher rate of dual SVR35 and TSS50, with a higher rate of improved individual symptom scores. The safety profile was comparable with ruxolitinib monotherapy, with a lower incidence of anemia. The results of MANIFEST-2 highlight pelabresib as a potential treatment option for JAKI-naïve MF for extended investigation in clinical trials.
Rampal R. Pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib for Janus kinase inhibitor treatment-naïve patients with myelofibrosis: Results of the MANIFEST-2 randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. Oral abstract #628. 65th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; Dec 11, 2023; San Diego, US.
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox