All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your MPN Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
MPN are associated with numerous symptoms that can severely impact patient QoL and ability to conduct activities of daily living.1 Whilst previous studies have demonstrated differences in patient- vs physician-reported MPN symptom burden, studies directly comparing perception of symptom burden between matched patient and physician responses are lacking.1 Manz et al.1 conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 3,979 patients with MPN (38% ET, 33% PV, 21% PMF, and 8% other/unclassified MPN) from the GSG-MPN Bioregistry to provide an intra-individual comparison of patient- and physician-reported symptom burden, with a focus on the impact of symptom burden on OS. Patient symptom ratings were assessed using a modified MPN-SAF-TSS assessment and matched with physician assessments conducted within 3 months. Findings were published in Leukemia.1
|
Key learnings |
93% of patients reported the presence of ≥1 symptom at baseline, with severe disease burden reported by 38% of patients. Severe patient-reported symptoms were an independent risk factor for death. All symptoms were reported more frequently by patients than physicians. |
Fatigue was the most commonly reported symptom by both patients and physicians. However, reports of fatigue were significantly different between patients (82% to 85%) and physicians (26% to 36%) (p < 0.001). |
Sleep hyperhidrosis, pain, and pruritus were the second most commonly reported symptoms, followed by weight loss and fever. Pruritus was reported most commonly in PV by both patients (60%) and physicians (27%) (p < 0.001). |
These findings suggest significant discrepancies in symptom recognition between patients and physicians (with physicians underestimating the presence of symptoms) and demonstrate the association of severe patient-reported outcomes with survival, highlighting the need for careful patient-reported symptom assessment using validated tools, both in routine clinical practice and clinical trials. |
Abbreviations: ET, essential thrombocytosis; GSG-MPN, German Study Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasms; MPN-SAF-TSS, Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score; OS, overall survival; PMF, primary myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to MPN delivered to your inbox