All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.

  TRANSLATE

The MPN Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the MPN Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The MPN Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health, GSK, Sobi, Novartis, and Takeda Oncology, and supported through independent educational grants from Blueprint Medicines, Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

LIMBER-304 phase III: Parsaclisib + ruxolitinib for MF

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Jun 23, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in myelofibrosis.


Results from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III LIMBER-304 study (NCT04551053), evaluating add-on parsaclisib, a phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, + ruxolitinib in 177 adults with myelofibrosis (MF) and suboptimal or declining response to ruxolitinib, were published in The Oncologist by Kiladjian et al. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥25% spleen volume reduction (SVR) from baseline to Week 24. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a ≥50% reduction in Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) total symptom score (TSS) from baseline to Week 24. 

Key data: At Week 24, SVR ≥25% was achieved by 16.7% of study participants receiving parsaclisib + ruxolitinib (n = 90) vs 9.7% receiving placebo + ruxolitinib (n = 87). By Week 24, a ≥50% reduction in MFSAF TSS was observed in 17.1% vs 14.1%, respectively. Neither endpoint reached statistical significance. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 60.0% of patients receiving parsaclisib + ruxolitinib vs 42.5% of patients receiving placebo + ruxolitinib. The most frequently reported Grade ≥3 TEAEs in the parsaclisib + ruxolitinib cohort were anemia (22.2%), decreased platelet count (16.7%), thrombocytopenia (10.0%), pneumonia (7.8%), COVID-19 (5.6%), and COVID-19 pneumonia (5.6%). A greater proportion of patients receiving parsaclisib vs placebo experienced serious adverse events (SAEs; 36.7% vs 17.2%). The study was terminated early due to futility. 

Key learning: The addition of parsaclisib to ruxolitinib was unlikely to provide clinically meaningful benefits in patients with MF and suboptimal or declining response to ruxolitinib, with a higher incidence of SAEs.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content