All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the MPN Advocates Network.
The mpn Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mpn Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mpn and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The MPN Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AOP Health and GSK, and supported through an educational grant from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mpn content recommended for you
The SoC in intermediate- and high-risk MF is JAKi monotherapy. However, some patients treated with JAKi experience suboptimal responses and TEAEs, highlighting the need for additional treatment options for this patient population. The primary analysis from the phase III MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495), evaluating the efficacy and safety of the BET inhibitor pelabresib + ruxolitinib vs ruxolitinib + placebo in JAKi-naïve patients with MF, met its primary endpoint. During the European Hematology Association 2025 Congress, Alessandro Vannucchi presented the 72-week follow-up efficacy and safety results from MANIFEST-2.1 In the MANIFEST-2 trial, eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either Pela + Rux (n = 214) or Pbo + Rux (n = 216). At Week 72, 53.3% and 55.6% of patients in the Pela + Rux and Pbo + Rux groups continued to receive treatment. The primary endpoint of MANIFEST-2 was SVR35 response. Key secondary endpoints included absolute change in TSS from baseline, TSS50 response, and safety.
|
Key learnings |
At Week 72, Pela + Rux showed sustained improvements in SVR35 response (46.3% vs 29.2%), and a higher proportion of patients maintained SVR35 responses (80% vs 73%) vs Pbo + Rux. |
TSS50 response rates at Week 72 were higher with Pela + Rux vs Pbo + Rux (42.1% vs 35.2%), with an absolute change in TSS of -15.42 and -13.19, respectively. |
The proportion of patients achieving both SVR35 and TSS50 responses was nearly double with Pela + Rux vs Pbo + Rux (31.3% vs 17.6%). |
At 72 weeks, Hb response rates were higher (16.4% vs 9.3%) with Pela + Rux vs Pbo + Rux, with a lower proportion of patients requiring RBC transfusions during Weeks 49–72 (19.3% vs 25.3%). |
Grade ≥1 BMF improvements were higher with Pela + Rux vs Pbo + Rux (51.4% vs 28.2%). Grade ≥3 anemia and thrombocytopenia were reported in 27.4% vs 40.7% and 12.7% vs 6.1% of patients with Pela + Rux vs Pbo + Rux. |
Pela + Rux continues to demonstrate clinically meaningful responses vs Pbo + Rux, with correlative biomarkers such as deep and sustained spleen reduction, TSS and TSS50 improvements, and high rates of dual SRV35/TSS50 suggesting disease modification. |
Abbreviations: BET, bromodomain and extra-terminal; BMF, bone marrow fibrosis; Hb, hemoglobin; JAKi, Janus kinase inhibitor; MF, myelofibrosis; Pela, pelabresib; Pbo, placebo; RBC, red blood cell; Rux, ruxolitinib; SoC, standard of care; SVR35, spleen volume reduction ≥35%; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; TSS, total symptom score; TSS50, ≥50% reduction in total symptom score.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content